|
|
|
|
|
by anamax
5005 days ago
|
|
> The risk was already taken by the original lender, it was risk of default and was the reason for charging interest. ... So The risk assumed by debt collectors is less legitimate, and a collector's claim is on shakier legal basis Not so fast. The price that I'm willing to pay for something, the risk that I'm willing to take, depends on whether I'm able to sell my interest to someone else. Curiously enough, other people aren't very willing to buy worthless things. If debt collectors have "less legitimate" claims than the original lenders, they're not going to pay as much as they will if their claims have the same legitimacy. As a result, original lenders are going to demand more interest and protection for their interests. If you want people to make risky loans, you must protect the rights of folks who buy loans that have fallen on hard times. |
|
Maybe lenders shouldn't be making such risky loans. Perhaps that could have averted the housing bubble. Maybe college tuition in the US wouldn't be rocketing sky-high past inflation. Its hard to know who is real benefactor of such willingness to lend. Far from clear that its the borrower..