|
|
|
|
|
by SebastianKra
199 days ago
|
|
Yeah that's one of the practical workarounds I mentioned. It mostly comes up while spreading (which is why spreads should usually go first) and when persisting (which is why your ORM should have a runtime schema). But it's a double edged sword: - You can brand types with additional information. For example, React Query does this to keep track of which type is stored under which cache-key. This is where most strongly typed languages just give up. - You can progressively extend/narrow types without having to worry about inheritance. Invariants can be statically checked by encoding them in a type: eg IssuedInvoice = Invoice & { … }. A function that needs only a subset of a domain-object can specify this rather than requiring the email-address to verify a phone number. - You can even emulate nominal types using keyed unions. The first two alone have saved me from more errors than structural typing introduced. |
|