|
|
|
|
|
by WalterBright
194 days ago
|
|
The notion that because it is undefined behavior means that the compiler is free to replace it with anything up to and including "launch nuclear missiles". This is just nuts. If I program it to cause a null pointer seg fault, I expect a null pointer seg fault. If I program it to cause a twos complement overflow, I want a twos complement overflow. |
|