Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wetherbeei 4999 days ago
This has been done many times before, and all rely on a trusted 3rd party to do what they say. I spent a few years on and off toying with this idea, and came up with a solution that does not need any 3rd party middleman to transmit keys or delete messages after a period of time.

If you want a real challenge, figure out how to do that.

1 comments

Yes, you're absolutely right that this has been done many times before. The goal was more in lines of a learning experience for myself than to create something unique. You have captured my attention, though, can you give me a hint into the right direction on how to avoid the 3rd party?
Distributed Hash Tables, but then you need to solve the security issues of secure bootstrapping, Sybil attacks, and partitioning.

I was aiming for the most secure implementation, assuming someone had control over many pieces of the puzzle/network.