[Barathkanna]

A lot of the time it’s less “nobody checked the security inbox” and more “the one person who understands that part of the system is juggling twelve other fires.” Security fixes are often a one-hour patch wrapped in two weeks of internal routing, approvals, and “who even owns this code?” archaeology. Holiday schedules and spam filters don’t help, but organizational entropy is usually the real culprit.

[Aurornis]

> A lot of the time it’s less “nobody checked the security inbox” and more “the one person who understands that part of the system is juggling twelve other fires.”

At my past employers it was "The VP of such-and-such said we need to ship this feature as our top priority, no exceptions"

[whstl]

I've once had a whole sector of a fintech go down because one DevOps person ignored daily warning emails for three months that an API key was about to expire and needed reset.

And of course nobody remembered the setup, and logging was only accessible by the same person, so figuring out also took weeks.

[bongodongobob]

I'm currently on the other side of this trying to convince management that the maintenance that should have been done 3 years ago needs to get done. They need "justification".

[jll29]

Write a short memo that saying you are very concerned, and describe a range of things that may happen (from "not much" over medium to maximum scare - lawsuits, brand/customer trust destroyed etc.).

Email the memo to a decision maker with the important flag on and CC: another person as a witness.

If you have been saying it for a long time and nobody has taken any action, you may use the word "escalation" as part of the subject line.

If things hit the fan, it will also make sure that what drops from the fan falls on the right people, and not on you.

[ChrisMarshallNY]

It could also be someone "practicing good time management."

They have a specific time of day, when they check their email, and they only give 30 minutes to that time, and they check emails from most recent, down.

The email comes in, two hours earlier, and, by the time they check their email, it's been buried under 50 spams, and near-spams; each of which needs to be checked, so they run out of 30 minutes, before they get to it. The next day, by email check time, another 400 spams have been thrown on top.

Think I'm kidding?

Many folks that have worked for large companies (or bureaucracies) have seen exactly this.

[eru]

The system would be mostly sane, if you could sort by some measure of importance, not just recency.

[throwaway290]

It's not about fixing it, it's about acknowledging it exists