|
|
|
|
|
by eirikbakke
198 days ago
|
|
I concur. This was my main experience with WSL1 vs. WSL2. If I'm running Windows, it means that the files and projects that I care about are on the Windows file system. And they need to be there, because my IDE and other GUI apps needs files to be on a real file system to work optimally. (A network share to a WSL2 file system would not let the IDE watch for changes, for instance.) WSL1 was a great way to get a UNIX-style command line, with git, bash, latex etc., for the Windows file system. WSL2 was just too slow for this purpose; commands like "git status" would take multiple seconds on a large codebase. Now I switched back to MacOS, and the proper UNIX terminal is a great advantage. |
|