[shawabawa3]

> but also the timeline strongly implies that a specific source was simply guessing the URL of the PDF long before it was uploaded

A bunch of people were scraping commonly used urls based on previous OBR reports, in order to report as soon as it was live, as it common with all things of this kind

The mistake was that the URL should have been obfuscated, and only changed to the "clear" URL at publish time, but a plugin was bypassing that and aliasing the "clear" URL to the obfuscated one

[physicsguy]

> in order to report as soon as it was live

We don't actually know that, it's just that the report did hit Reuters pretty swiftly.