[embedding-shape]

> The idea that any (currently realistic) cheat prevention is unbypassable is silly.

The idea that anti-cheats don't make sense because they don't catch 100% of the cheaters is what's silly, who believes that? Not even the people writing these anti-cheats believe catching 100% of them are possible, why are you under the assumption that others think that's possible?

If it removes 80% of the cheaters from the game, the experience goes from "Holy shit lets leave" to "Ok, bothersome, but fine", this is what they're reaching for, not some fantasy utopia that you seem to be under the impression is the target.

[saghm]

I don't think the comment you're responding to is trying to claim that. They're responding to the parent comment asking if there's any way to actually make a Linux anti-cheat method that isn't bypassable and pointing out that this framing isn't really useful because there's no way to make one on any platform that's actually impossible to bypass. Their point isn't about whether it's useful or not to have imperfect anti-cheat but that there's nothing fundamental about Linux that changes the fact that the anti-cheat is going to be imperfect anywhere.

[krzyk]

> the experience goes from "Holy shit lets leave" to "Ok, bothersome, but fine",

This is making those rootkit anitcheat mechanism work. If people will leave, cheaters will play only with cheaters - problem solved.

[embedding-shape]

> If people will leave, cheaters will play only with cheaters - problem solved.

Yeah, but it's a bit like the ultimately solution to climate warming; getting rid of all humans on the planet. Fine, it solves the problem, but who is staying to enjoy the solution?