Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by magicalist 204 days ago
Is your argument that Terence Tao says it was a consequence from a known result and he categorizes it as low hanging fruit, but to you it feels like one of those things that's only obvious in retrospect after it's explained to you, and without "evidence" of Tao's claim, you're going to go with your vibes?

What exactly would constitute evidence?

2 comments

Known result from where? I failed to see the reference where it was proven before. Maybe I missed it. Do you have a reference?
Consequence from a known result describes literally every proof.