Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by conartist6 198 days ago
That's a strategy for producing maximally convincing BS content, but the scientific method was absent. I'm sure it was an oversight... ; )
1 comments

That’s on you. You get to decide what “best” means when picking among the K, so you only get bs if you want bs.

I occasionally get people telling me AI is unreliable, and I tell them the same thing: the tech is nearly infinitely flexible (computing over the space of ideas!), so that says a lot more about how they’re using it.

So to really think the person writing the paper is the right one to review it?