Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
SG-
199 days ago
well they were using Unreal engine before and it was much slower as indicated. they managed to get what they wanted at 8k/60fps which was also their goal so three.js was right for them?
1 comments
samdoesnothing
199 days ago
I'm not saying it was the wrong choice in hindsight but Three.js is not particularly fast either so I'm surprised they managed to get 8k/60 out of it.
link