Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vidarh 205 days ago
Because you get the biggest time-savings when you can let it run longer between each time it needs a human in the loop.

I have multi-week runs of Claude Code going to work on a compiler project. I have a week-long run of Claude Code where it is writing a real-time strategy game.

In both cases I occasionally review code, and complain a bit about things it has gotten wrong until it's back on track. In both cases it is working to specs that have produced plans that have produced TODO lists. In the latter it wrote the specs itself. In the former, the specs are externally imposed (rubyspecs test suite).

In both cases it means I get involved ranging from ever tens of minutes to every few hours, but mostly then to just confirm it can continue, with more detailed reviews every day or so.

Having to review output and give instructions every turn would drastically diminish the value.

1 comments

Roughly how much per day do these multi-week run end up costing?
I'm on the top Claude Max tier. Just upgraded. I could probably make do with the lower one, but I hit the limit (for the first time) on the lower Claude Max this week, and I get enough value from it that I was not about to wait for a session reset.