|
|
|
|
|
|
by crowbahr
199 days ago
|
|
|
The linked study r values are all minor to no effect. -0.37 as an r value is barely correlated. Talk to me when they're up above -.5 How much of it is just constantly being told that SFVs are bad for you? The linked article is a meta analysis with basically 0 controls that finds a statistical correlation barely better than background noise. Yawn |
|
|