|
|
|
|
|
by sholain
197 days ago
|
|
There are quite large 'switching costs' from moving a solution that's dependent on on model and ecosystem, to another. Models have to significantly outperform on some metric in order to even justify looking at it. Even for smaller 'entrenchements' like individual developers - Gemeni 3 had our attention for all of 7 days, now that Opus 4.5 is out, well, none of my colleagues are talking abut G3 anymore. I mean, it's a great model, but not 'good enough' yet. I use that as an example to illustrate broader dynamics. Open AI, Anthropic and Google are the primary participants here, with Grok possibly playing a role, and of course all of the Chinese models being an unknown quantity because they're exceptional in different ways. |
|
That means that none of these products can ever have a high profit margin. They have to keep margins razor thin at best (deeply negative at present) to stay relevant. In order to achieve the kinds of margins that real moats provide, these labs need major research breakthroughs. And we haven't had any of those since Attention is All You Need.