|
|
|
|
|
by philipallstar
209 days ago
|
|
It's very common to use identical systems but anonymised data shipped back to test environments in such cases. There are certain test card numbers that always fail or always succeed against otherwise-real infrastructure on the card provider's side. |
|
My point above was that it's not necessarily easy to convince the operators of a business that it's a justifiable engineering expense to set up a new "prodlike but with anonymized data" environment from scratch, because it's not a trivial thing to make and maintain.
I do think it's pretty easy to convince operators of a business to adopt the other strategy suggested in a sibling thread: run a dry mode parallel code path, verify its results, and cut over when you have confidence. This shouldn't really be an alternative to a test environment, but they can both achieve similar stuff.