|
|
|
|
|
by bryanrasmussen
206 days ago
|
|
>Your remark about aesthetic would map 1:1 to poor code quality. (LLM code quality can be pretty bad, depends on prompt like always). no it wouldn't, poor code quality would map to hands with 10 fingers on them, aesthetic maps more to if every code generated, no matter the language, looked like it was written by someone who knows all the technical specifications of the language and never makes a bug but because of their personal preference and comfort zone writes everything as though they were a Java expert and preferred writing code in a Java OO idiomatic manner. The aesthetic complaints about AI art of any sort is it is boring and easily recognizable as AI, boring and easily recognizable coding styles are generally a benefit in code. |
|