|
|
|
|
|
by bduerst
5005 days ago
|
|
The only strong case here is in the IP address geo-identification. Traynor could identify them if he were to cross validate the IP address location with a list of known friends and family - people of whom would have Traynor's personal address. But Traynor should have suspected his friend - not his friend's teenage son. That's the part of the story that doesn't add up. |
|
Really? He should suspect his friend that he knows intimately rather than his friend's teenage son which he doesn't know very well and is of an age to be up to mischief? In what universe does that line of reasoning make sense?