|
|
|
|
|
by aurareturn
202 days ago
|
|
These "AI bubble" pop stories are tiring. Vast majority of them fall into one of these categories: * They're hoping AI doesn't get good enough that their job is made redundant. Calling it an AI bubble and saying it will collapse is copium. * They feel like they missed investing in AI and is now hoping AI stocks drop 50-80% so they can finally buy in * They work in a job that AI hasn't penetrated deeply yet so they're unaware of just how useful it is even today Most of these journalists, who are so sure that we're in an AI bubble and it's going to collapse, do not have an economic background nor tech background. I don't understand how they are so confident. In general, the mass media is very much anti-tech. Even before the AI boom, the mass media is overwhelmingly negative on big tech companies and most startups. Of course they are cheering/hoping for an AI collapse. |
|
Barring the unlikely scenario that you're privy to the financials of all the big vendors, you are just as guilty as they might be. You've just on the other side.
You don't have to be anti tech in order to question valuations or investments the likes of which are going into AI