[conartist6]

Feels like the useless kind of corporate policy, expressed in terms of the loftiest ideals instead of how to make real trade offs with costs

[SiempreViernes]

It is a organisation wide document of "General principles", how could it possibly have something more specific to say that about the inherently context specific trade-offs of each specific use of AI?

[mariusor]

Well, CERN is not a corporation, it can afford not optimizing for "costs", whatever you mean by that in this context.

[alkonaut]

99% of corporate policies are to be able to point to a document that says "well it's not my fault, I made the policy and someone didn't follow it".

[marginalia_nu]

You don't even need to go as far as saying someone didn't follow the policy, you can just say you need to review the policies. That way, conveniently enough, nobody is really ever at fault!

[jordanpg]

Organizations above a certain size absolutely cannot help themselves but publish this stuff. It is the work of senior middle managers. Ark Fleet Ship B.

I work in a corporate setting that has been working on a "strategy rebrand" for over a year now and despite numerous meeting, endless powerpoint, and god knows how much money to consultants, I still have no idea what any of this has to do with my work.