|
|
|
|
|
by CrazyStat
203 days ago
|
|
I haven’t seen this representation before—I suppose the vertices of the graph are the chessboard squares, the edges
are adjacency (white squares can only be adjacent to black squares and vice versa, which gives the bipartite-ness), and covering two squares corresponds to removing those two vertices from the graph? |
|
The chessboard in the article is a bipartite graph with different number of vertices in the two groups, so it cannot have a perfect matching.