[skeledrew]

Author did review the (also generated) tests, which as long as they're comprehensive enough for his purposes, all pass and coverage is very high, means things work well enough. Attempting to manually edit that code is a whole other thing though.

[auggierose]

That argument might work for certain kinds of applications (none I'd like to use, though), but for a programming language, nope.

I am using LLMs to speed up coding as well, but you have to be super vigilant, and do it in a very modular way.

[skeledrew]

They literally just made it to do AoC challenges, and shared it for fun (and publicity).

[auggierose]

I don't think that contradicts my comment in any way. It's not a programming language then, it is a fun language.