Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by chuckadams 211 days ago
Cookie consent banners and such come from the ePrivacy Directive, not the GDPR. The banners themselves were never mandated, but lacking any other standardized opt-in signal, that's what everyone converged on anyway.
1 comments

To be clear, the other option was to respect privacy by default and comply with the GDPR without any banner.
A lot of sites put up the banner even when they're not serving anything but "essential cookies", just as a CYA mechanism mandated by legal. And to some degree, I can see legal's point: the site might be just fine now, but you just know somewhere in the sausage-making process, someone's eventually going to toss in a dependency that brings in a tracker without clearing it first, and boom, exposure.

Having a clear non-interactive signal that's legally recognized should go a long way toward clearing out those annoying banners.