[collingreen]

What a bizarre argument. Where is the implication even coming from that gets you to the idea they can't think government services can be better for the people than private products unless you "agree with the US's current budget". Why would the current us budget, good or bad, efficiently spent or not, deeply corrupt or perfectly honest, be the only criteria for having an opinion on shared services versus private market?

Are you trying to say that you think the current US budget is bad and therefore all government spending for all time is inherently bad and worse than every other option? If so that's a really weak take.