[DrBazza]

The cost of nuclear is two fold - government bureaucracy, and the lack of commercialization due to decades of misinformation from the eco-groups.

The plans just to build a tunnel under the Thames in the UK in 2025 is over 2 million pages at the moment, imagine what it is for the Sizewell C reactor - the environmental assessment on its own was 44,000 pages.

SMRs are a good middle ground because they can be commercialized and cost can be driven down once the government gets out of the way.

[fundatus]

> the lack of commercialization due to decades of misinformation from the eco-groups

The lack of commercialization has exactly a single reason: The lack of commercial viability.

[lostlogin]

> The cost of nuclear is two fold - government bureaucracy, and the lack of commercialization due to decades of misinformation from the eco-groups.

The misinformation hasn’t occurred in a vacuum. The nuclear industry has been far from transparent in how it operates.