Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by globalnode 211 days ago
so user either has a malware proxy running requests without being noticed or voluntarily signed up as a proxy to make extra $ off their home connection. Either way I dont care if their IP is blocked. Only problem is if users behind CGNAT get their IP blocked then legitimate users may later be blocked.

edit: ah yes another person above mentioned VPN's thats a good possibility, also another vector is users on mobile can sell their extra data that they dont use to 3rd parties. probably many more ways to acquire endpoints.

1 comments

“Known IP addresses” to me implies an infrequently changing list of large datacenter ranges. Maintaining a dynamic list (along with any metadata required for throttling purposes) of individual IPs is a different undertaking with higher level of effort.

Of course, if you don’t care about affecting genuine users then it is much simpler. One could say it’s collateral damage and show a message suggesting to boycott companies and/or business practices that prompted these measures.