[rkomorn]

> I always think: how can someone think this is acceptable? Steve Jobs wouldn’t.

The same Steve Jobs that was at Apple when it made the puck mouse? The overheating Intel laptops of the mid 2000s? The "you're holding it wrong" iPhone? The "unusably slow after two years" 11in MBA? The Cube?

He wouldn't what, exactly?

[jen729w]

> the puck mouse?

My mate Tim, professional graphic designer, used it for years. Loved it. He might still have it for all I know.

> The "you're holding it wrong" iPhone?

Was always nonsense. None of the Apple team used 'the bumper' and neither did I.

> The "unusably slow after two years" 11in MBA?

Are you seriously here criticising one of the most revolutionary hardware products of the last 20 years?

FWIW I used mine for years and had a corporate Windows image running under Parallels. Everyone was massively envious. (I was a Domain Admin, I could add my own machine to the network.)

> The Cube?

I'll give you that one.

[bigyabai]

Calling the 11" MBA "the most revolutionary hardware" of anything is one for the books.

[rkomorn]

Say hi to your friend Tim Theoutlier for me.

Also good to know the iPhone 4 thing was people lying instead of holding it wrong, I guess.

What exactly was revolutionary about the 11" MBA? Looking better than an equally performant netbook?

The notion that things were so much better under Jobs is just revisionist history.

Saying "Steve Jobs wouldn't have let today's Apple be this way" while ignoring what Apple was like in his day is just rose tinted glasses (or worse, cult of personality nonsense).