|
|
|
|
|
by giobox
211 days ago
|
|
The risk surely exists if you decide to run their gate service: "After you activate the VPN Gate Service, anyone can connect a VPN connection to your computer, and access to any hosts on the Internet via your computer" "When you are running the VPN Gate Relaying Function on your company's network, then any person's communication to Internet hosts will be relayed via your company's network." > https://www.vpngate.net/en/join.aspx There's simply no way I would offer my residential or company IPs as exit nodes to strangers. > Third, make each client automatically host a temporary server and broadcast its IP to the public server lists when in use. If this came to pass, much the same problems. |
|
The point of all this is to make it so that governments can't pin down the IP of any client without expending significant resources. It makes mass surveillance, control, and prosecution prohibitively expensive. Law enforcement would still be able to trace suspects through the hops with their rich arsenal of backdoors, exploits, and clues in the physical world, just not without significant effort and therefore expenses. So they will only be able to pursue criminals in a targeted manner, which is how law enforcement in a free society is supposed to work.
The decentralized VPN service can only work if clients are also servers, otherwise there will be too many people who use the service without contributing to it, resulting in a tragedy of the commons.