[hereme888]

Russia is not even remotely similar to the U.S.A. in terms of freedom, rights, and infrastructure.

Politicians will never be able to ban VPNs or vetted e2e encryption (like signal, and now X) in the US. Especially with this strongly pro-American, strongly pro-privacy admin and Supreme Justices on the watch.

[bccdee]

> Especially with this strongly pro-American, strongly pro-privacy admin

lol

"pro-privacy" and "pro-cop" are diametrically opposed, and Republicans pick "pro-cop" every time. And "pro-American" doesn't mean anything; it's a marketing term.

> Supreme Justices on the watch.

Have you been keeping up with their rulings? The Roberts court is completely spineless. They do whatever the administration wants and justify it post-hoc. In their shadow docket rulings, they don't even bother with justifications.

[gilli]

Tell me another joke..

[hereme888]

Here's one: How successful was the combined efforts of politicians + 3-letter agencies + universities, at banning computer encryption in the past? Not successful at all, hahaha.

[bccdee]

Banning encryption proved infeasible, so they just switched to programs like PRISM instead. That was very successful.

[hereme888]

Let me explain a bit further:governments lost the battle to ban code. Since then, no code can really get banned. And, nowadays we have vetted p2p VPNs even if all world govs try to ban vpn companies, and no prism or quantum computing programs can bypass their post-quantum e2e implementation.

[bccdee]

Code is already banned by anti-circumvention laws.¹ I'm sure it wouldn't be that hard, legislatively, to have VPNs classified as a tool for circumventing "digital locks."

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-circumvention#Distributio...