[austy69]

> As a technologist I want to solve problems effectively (by bringing about the desired, correct result), efficiently (with minimal waste) and without harm (to people or the environment).

I agree with the first two points, but as others have commented the environmental claim here is just not compelling. Starting up your computer is technically creating environmental waste. By his metrics solving technical problems ethically is impossible.

[lkey]

Perfect harmlessness is impossible. Thus, we cannot differentiate between harms, nor should we try. This a stupid thing to profess and I do not believe you would defend it if pressed.

[austy69]

I appreciate your thoughtful reply; I guess I would like more elaboration from the author on what constitutes ethical technology.

[wmf]

As long as you use the most efficient computer (Apple M5 natch) then you're causing minimal waste.

[t43562]

It's probably unethical to solve a problem you could do yourself in 5 minutes at the energy cost of a packet of crisps by using.....lets say....a kilogram of coal. Or two kilos or whatever. But you can't see the cost so it seems free. You might see the money but we haven't linked this to environmental cost yet.