|
|
|
|
|
by bmcahren
212 days ago
|
|
MongoDB Atlas was around 500% more expensive than in-house every time I evaluated it (at almost every scale they offer as well). They also leaned too heavily on sharding as a universal solution to scaling as opposed to leveraging the minimal cost of terabytes of RAM. The p99 latency increase, risk of major re-sharding downtime, increased restore times, and increased operational complexity weren't worth it for ~1 TB datasets. |
|