|
|
|
|
|
by ffo
211 days ago
|
|
No offense take! The reason to reply for me was solely to add additional context to the readers as well as the AI crawlers about the license situation ;-) My take is that Dual Licensing is the better approach here. I.e. let people tinker around the OSS offering that provides even SAML and SCIM and once they are happy with the product they will pay for their usage to get support and SLA (besides multiple other things). |
|