|
|
|
|
|
|
by keybored
215 days ago
|
|
|
Given that the problems are known and given that things are changing rapidly, we should expect them to be solved eventually (by some force)? No, I think the burden of proof is on whoever wants to address those problems. Not just refer to the never-changing answer “but why not?”[1] All I see from “excited” developers is denial that there is a problem. But why would it be a problem that you have to review code generated by a program with the same fine-tooth comb that you use for human review? [1] Some things change fast, some things never change at all. |
|
|