|
|
|
|
|
by _bernd
217 days ago
|
|
> I dunno if I'd characterize this as "public" Then define public and state what's wrong with this repo which conflicts from your definition of public. For me this looks like a fine public resource and after a short glimpse it looks like that you should be able to even build this effing source code from this repo. Edit ps. If you edit your own content then please leave a note about what you have changed please |
|
As far as I can tell, they wrote a script to download the source packages they provide and then try to reconstruct them into a GitLab repo.