[astrange]

I did have one drive straight through a big pothole in LA once, and I also felt like it chose extremely boring routes. But neither of those are very surprising.

Oh, and it doesn't like to pull into hotel entrances but instead stops randomly on the street outside it.

[andsoitis]

> and I also felt like it chose extremely boring routes

$$ opportunity: pay $10 extra and Waymo will choose more exciting route.

[tgsovlerkhgsel]

Or "pay $10 extra and it'll drive extremely aggressively" (in the acceleration/braking/taking turns at speed sense, i.e. only ways that don't affect safety, not "cutting people off").

The sane default is obviously "boring", as it projects an image of safety and control, is comfortable, and reduces wear on the car... but if the user pays for the wear and wants an uncomfortable ride, why not?

[sdenton4]

Maintaining safety across multiple driving "modes" multiplies the complexity of the problem, in a space where safety incidents can shift public opinion of the whole industry. This is a bad idea...

[socalgal2]

roads are shared resources. As long as it's not breaking any laws then sure but please don't ask it to raise the risks to other people on the road. Just tune out on your phone/tablet/laptop and ignore the boring safer ride.

[kbaker]

I mean, if the scenic route is longer anyways, the revenue potential is there to fund it...

just a 'take me the scenic route' checkbox?