[nlh]

What's remarkable to me is how deep OpenAI is going on "ChatGPT as communication partner / chatbot", as opposed to Anthropic's approach of "Claude as the best coding tool / professional AI for spreadsheets, etc.".

I know this is marketing at play and OpenAI has plenty of resources developed to advancing their frontier models, but it's starting to really come into view that OpenAI wants to replace Google and be the default app / page for everyone on earth to talk to.

[Workaccount2]

OpenAI said that only ~4% of generated tokens are for programming.

ChatGPT is overwhelmingly, unambiguously, a "regular people" product.

[9cb14c1ec0]

Yes, just look at the stats on OpenRouter. OpenAI has almost totally lost the programming market.

[NullCascade]

As a happy OpenRouter user I know the vast majority of the industry directly use vendor APIs and that the OpenRouter rankings are useless for those models.

[GaggiX]

OpenRouter probably doesn't mean much given that you can use the OpenAI API directly with the openai library that people use for OpenRouter too.

[arthur-st]

OpenAI is BYOK-only on OpenRouter, which artificially depresses its utilization there.

[moomoo11]

I use codex high because Anthropic CC max plan started fucking people over who want to use opus. Sonnet kind of stinks on more complex problems that opus can crush, but they want to force sonnet usage and maybe they want to save costs.

Codex 5 high does a great job for the advanced use cases I throw at it and gives me generous usage.

[cwbriscoe]

Well that may also be because ChatGPT is worse than Gemini and Claude for coding. I don't know what the benchmarks say, I am just saying that from my own experience.

[csomar]

> ChatGPT is overwhelmingly, unambiguously, a "regular people" product.

How many of these people are paying and how much are they paying, though. Most "regular" people I met that have switched to ChaptGPT are using it as an alternative to search engines and are not paying for it (only one person I know is paying and he is using the Sora model to generate images for his business).

[raincole]

It's just another sign telling you that OpenAI's end game is selling ads.

[sethops1]

I really struggle to see a path where $.01 ad inventory covers the cost of inference, much less training or any other of OpenAI ventures. Unless every query makes you watch a 30 second unskippable video or something equally awful.

[felipeerias]

Users will ask ChatGPT for recommendations and the answer will feature products and services that have paid to be there, probably with some sort of attribution mechanism so OpenAI can get paid extra if the user ends up completing the purchase.

[technotony]

Checkout will happen directly in the app, and yes they will collect a fee on it.

[Workaccount2]

ChatGPT will become a salesman working on commission.

[raincole]

People are literally using ChatGPT as their therapists now. It can displays targeted ads with precision we've never seen before if OpenAI wants.

[airstrike]

I mean, yes, but also because it's not as good as Claude today. Bit of a self fulfilling prophecy and they seem to be measuring the wrong thing.

4% of their tokens or total tokens in the market?

[KronisLV]

> I mean, yes, but also because it's not as good as Claude today.

I'm not sure, sometimes GPT-5 Codex (or even the regular GPT-5 with Medium/High reasoning) can do things Sonnet 4.5 would mess up (most recently, figuring out why some wrappers around PrimeVue DataTable components wouldn't let the paginator show up and work correctly; alongside other such debugging) and vice versa, sometimes Gemini 2.5 Pro is also pretty okay (especially when it comes to multilingual stuff), there's a lot of randomness/inconsistency/nuance there but most of the SOTA models are generally quite capable. I kinda thought GPT-5 wasn't very good a while ago but then used it a bunch more and my views of it improved.

[withinboredom]

Codex is great for fixing memory leaks systematically. Claude will just read the code and say “oh, it’s right here” then change something and claim it fixed it. It didn’t fix it and it doesn’t undo its useless change when you point out that it didn’t fix it.

[airstrike]

Out of curiosity, did you try asking Opus 4.1 as well?

[KronisLV]

Afraid not, a bit outside of my budget (given that I've been pushing millions of tokens daily, especially for lots of refactoring that'd be great to do in an automated fashion but codegen solutions for which... just don't exist). From what little I've used Opus in the past, I'm sure it'd do reasonably as well. Maybe even Sonnet with more attempts, different prompts etc.

[tokioyoyo]

You're underestimating the amount of general population that's using ChatGPT. Us, people using it for codegen, are extreme minority.

[Workaccount2]

Their tokens, they released a report a few months ago.

However, I can only imagine that OpenAI outputs the most intentionally produced tokens (i.e. the user intentionally went to the app/website) out of all the labs.

[malshe]

> it's not as good as Claude today

In my experience this is not true anymore. Of course, mine is just one data point.

[kristianp]

I think there's a lot of similarity between the conversationalness of Claude and ChatGPT. They are both sycophantic. So this release focuses on the conversational style,it doesn't mean OpenAI has lost the technical market. People a reading a lot into a point-release.

[mlsu]

I think this is because Anthropic has principles and OpenAI does not.

Anthropic seems to treat Claude like a tool, whereas OpenAI treats it more like a thinking entity.

In my opinion, the difference between the two approaches is huge. If the chatbot is a tool, the user is ultimately in control; the chatbot serves the user and the approach is to help the user provide value. It's a user-centric approach. If the chatbot is a companion on the other hand, the user is far less in control; the chatbot manipulates the user and the approach is to integrate the chatbot more and more into the user's life. The clear user-centric approach is muddied significantly.

In my view, that is kind of the fundamental difference between these two companies. It's quite significant.

[staticman2]

I don't follow Anthropic marketing but the system prompt for Claude.AI says sounds like a partner/ chatbot to me!

"Claude provides emotional support alongside accurate medical or psychological information or terminology where relevant."

and

" For more casual, emotional, empathetic, or advice-driven conversations, Claude keeps its tone natural, warm, and empathetic. Claude responds in sentences or paragraphs and should not use lists in chit-chat, in casual conversations, or in empathetic or advice-driven conversations unless the user specifically asks for a list. In casual conversation, it’s fine for Claude’s responses to be short, e.g. just a few sentences long." |

They also prompt Claude to never say it isn't conscious:

"Claude engages with questions about its own consciousness, experience, emotions and so on as open questions, and doesn’t definitively claim to have or not have personal experiences or opinions."