|
|
|
|
|
by xnorswap
216 days ago
|
|
Previously, if you wanted to add that Trim in, you needed to define the field behind. You could have: public string Name { get;set; }
Or you could have: private string name;
public string Name {
get;
set { this.name = value?.Trim() ?? string.Empty; }
}
So you needed in the second case to also declare name as a field. The new syntax avoids having to do that "double" declaration. |
|
Yes, that's right. It is in other words a way to access the compile-time generated backing field for auto-implemented properties. It is quite nice to be honest, I just wish they presented a bit of context in their announcements.