Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mr_mitm 219 days ago
Just because something has been done for a long time doesn't mean it's good. We also shouldn't confuse self-mutilation with healthy activities like exercising simply because both "shape one's own body".
2 comments

> Just because something has been done for a long time doesn't mean it's good.

This is true, although it is a good start, right? If a cultural practice has survived for many generations, this alone already indicates that the practice might be compatible with human society, morals, sustainability, etc.

> We also shouldn't confuse self-mutilation with healthy activities like exercising simply because both "shape one's own body".

True! We should indeed not confuse self-mutilation with healthy activities just because they share some similarities.

But would you classify scars or tattoos motivated by aesthetics as self-mutilation? What about piercings, such as holes for earrings or laser hair removal?

I believe that is an interesting and unusual position. Do you have an argument in favor of your (so far implicit) take?

> If a cultural practice has survived for many generations, this alone already indicates that the practice might be compatible with human society, morals, sustainability

Does it? This sounds like a disingenuous take that doesn't even pretend to bother with reality.

> But would you classify scars or tattoos motivated by aesthetics as self-mutilation?

Disingenuous question - the person you're replying to called you out for very obvious collating of body mutilation and fitness/medicine.

Are you an AI btw?

Tattoos are self-mutilation the same way that taxes are theft. This is the worst argument in the world [1]

-[1] https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yCWPkLi8wJvewPbEp/the-noncen...

I was talking about scars. I wasn't the one who said tattoos are scars.