[Marshferm]

It’s format based. The basis for explanations are folk science: stories. They aren’t any more accurate than when they began except they incorporate science. But that does not in itself make them scientific. Same with economics, which is not a science but it includes aspects of it. Now look at code, which is neither tethered to engineering or science, but exists wholly separate operating behavior, operating folk science and science yet in conflation winds up being folk science.

The news is folk science. Explanations (a dispute over money ends in murder) are substituted for correlations (not every dispute over money ends up violent). The news reinforces big techs reliance on exploitative explanation addiction rather than the widespread adoption of post folk science correlations.