| I have taken the classes and it really isn't as hard to follow the guidelines as you seem to be painting it. > Like 2 people talking and the 3rd overhearing is a violation This is the principle that "locker-room talk" in the workplace is not okay, and that's a good principle. Yes, it's not okay to have a "just us guys" conversation because the content of the conversation is not acceptable in the workplace. The fact a third-party overhearing it gets it reported isn't the issue. > Like not playing with the fantasies and embracing reality is a violation You'll have to be more specific about what fantasies you mean. I'm pretty sure I know, but you are continuing to dance around it and your reluctance to name words strongly suggests you know your opinion is unwelcome in polite society. > Being against (the "wrong one") discrimination is a violation Again, you'll have to be more clear. Sounds like you're toeing the line Damore toed before Google fired him. > Like communicating too much with a woman is a violation as is talking too little Neither of these are violations, and I don't think I know how someone concludes they are. > Don't [g]et me started on [] microaggression BS Microaggression theory is grounded in research dating back to the 1970s. Do you have some specific concerns with the research or its interpretation? The theory seems pretty sound from where I sit, but maybe I've missed something. > Did you know that liking progress, efficiency, technology, as well as simply being on time is a core of white suppremacy culture that is improperly and racially being imposed on the Black population? That's not at all what anyone has said. You are misinterpreting several layers of information that suggest to me that your frustration is second-hand. I'm going to have to call for a "cite your sources" on this claim. > In general, it is a violation if any delusional person decides to be offended, no matter the reality. This is, broadly, untrue. |