Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DontForgetMe 214 days ago
That report looked credible until the apparently serious claim "Elsewhere, he raises concerns that a unit of rogue LGBT+ reporters is censoring coverage of the trans debate".

Which was such a deranged claim to go without any substantiation, evidence or further sources, that I loved again at the publisher and remembered why nobody takes Telegraph stories seriously.

1 comments

what you wrote, can be equally applied to BBC with reports that reference "gaza health ministry" as source of truth without any substantiation, evidence or further sources