[ericbarrett]

I believe that more screen and reading time causes more childhood myopia. That seems hard to refute. I just do not believe, without serious peer-reviewed studies, that "a couple hours a day outside" is the magic cure. Out of my friend group, 3/4 of us needed glasses, and we definitely met the "couple hours a day outside" criterion. But we also loved our Street Fighter 2.

[linkregister]

Various peer-reviewed studies exist and have been covered by pop science articles over the past 15 years or so.

Here is an example one; there are likely dozens available.

Study with 65 citations: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7607527/

Pop science article with more context: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/nearsight... (https://archive.is/OeuC3)

[ericbarrett]

Thanks! The first study is interesting because it links axial eye growth inhibition to high light levels, not necessarily being strictly outdoors (UV) nor avoiding close-up activities like reading. Interesting.

[modeless]

"High light levels" makes it sound like you could just replace 50 watt bulbs with 100 watt bulbs indoors to fix the problem. It's not like that at all. Sunlight is dramatically brighter than indoor lighting, far more than people realize. It would be impractical to replicate sunlight brightness indoors for many reasons: energy consumption, the cost and size of the fixtures, the immense heat it would produce, and generally because it would be uncomfortable to have light sources that bright in close proximity to you.

And again I am skeptical of claims that it is just one factor like brightness alone. There is other research about spectrum and distant objects in view that also shows effects. So even if you did use 100x brighter lights in your house there's no guarantee you would fix the problem.

[jaggederest]

Here's your review:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9114237/