|
|
|
|
|
by debugnik
218 days ago
|
|
Okay but that's not a wiki. Wiki implies pages can be collaboratively edited and linked. Otherwise it's not a wiki, it's just a website. The only collaboration here is to bait people into becoming maintainers and fix the hallucinated content. More than one maintainer has shown frustration at that site making up wrong documentation already. |
|
You can definitely have a wiki of one user. And it's extremely common for organizations to have a wiki of only authorized users. Although in a high trust circumstance, there's really a good reason to lock users who can read the wiki out from editing the wiki as long as edits are audited.
(Regardless of all of that, I'm fairly certain the deepwiki output is editable?)