[khazhoux]

In fact, it was a photograph she took 8 months earlier, and she didn't realize its significance or implication. If useful data is shelved, is it still useful? For Watson, the image corroborated the double-helix theory and caused them to focus exclusively on that (instead of triple or single). The photograph itself did not deliver a DNA model.

[prmph]

All these excuses for a blatant case of cheating...

> she didn't realize its significance or implication.

That does not change the fact that they plagiarized and cheated. They could have collaborated with her and/or credited her

[poncho_romero]

They did collaborate with each other. The labs at King’s and Cambridge shared information at different times. Franklin invited Watson to her lecture. She and Wilkins went to see the double helix model when it was completed. You’re treating a sensationalized version of the story as fact.

[echelon]

> All these excuses for a blatant case of cheating

The man just died and it's as if you're trying to pry the Nobel Prize from him.

Franklin didn't know what she had. If she did, she would have been working on it.

In a moment of supreme clarity, the universe revealed itself. Watson and Crick knew immediately the photo would cut down their search space from alternative structures. They still had work to do, because the Angstrom length data is not a model by itself. It just constrained the geometry for the bonds and electrochemistry.