[tovej]

As I said below, DHH has repeatedly shown he's a bad actor, whether you think he's a nazi or not. He will continue to drive away sane people from the communities he's a part of.

He has also quite clearly taken a nazi or ethnonationalist stance. If we allow the term "nazi" to refer to people other than literal card-carrying members of the German Nazi party up until 1945, he fits the description accurately.

[throwawaypath]

>DHH has repeatedly shown he's a bad actor

No he hasn't. Holding heterodox opinions isn't being "a bad actor."

>He will continue to drive away sane people from the communities he's a part of.

He's driven insane people from the communities he's a part of. Sane people will flock to them.

>He has also quite clearly taken a nazi or ethnonationalist stance.

No he hasn't. There's nothing wrong with promoting or protecting the interests of native or indigenous people over those of immigrants or foreigners.

[tovej]

The bad actor part is e.g. shutting down review processes in his company when they contradict his beliefs, and plotting to oust people from RubyGems for having the wrong political beliefs.

And he is an ethnonationalist. In "As I remember London", he claimed Britain was a third native brit, then backed it up with a wikipedia link showing a third of London was white. So in DHH's mind white = British. There's no other way to interpret that, and he hasn't corrected it.

[throwawaypath]

>The bad actor part is e.g. shutting down review processes in his company when they contradict his beliefs

His company, his rules. He banned activist employees from using work as a platform to proselytize their grievance politics.

>In "As I remember London", he claimed Britain was a third native brit, then backed it up with a wikipedia link showing a third of London was white.

This is what happens when you only read posts on Bluesky/Mastodon. He claimed London was only a third "native Brit" which is the factual reality, backed up by Wikipedia. He didn't include "all Whites" just "White Brits." White Brits are the only native Brits to Britain.

>So in DHH's mind white = British.

Wrong. White Brit = native Brit, which is factually correct.

>There's no other way to interpret that

Correct, no other way to interpret the facts.

>and he hasn't corrected it.

"He hasn't removed the wrongthink!"

[tovej]

If you think white Brits are the only native Brits then you are also an ethnonationalist.

But even for a faulty ethnonationalist concept of nationality, the data point makes no sense. I'm white and born in Finland. By your logic, if I move to the UK and become a naturalized citizen, then I would be a native. Which is obviously not true. So the one third figure is both racist and incrdibly stupid.

Native means you're born somewhere. Equating nationality by skin color is ethnonationalism. So I guess congrats, you're a nazi.

[throwawaypath]

>If you think white Brits are the only native Brits then you are also an ethnonationalist.

There's no "thinking" White Brits are the only Brits native to Britain, they are. It's not ethnonationalist, it is an indisputable fact.

>the data point makes no sense

If you bothered to read his blog post, not just Bluesky/Mastodon comments, the data point makes a lot of sense.

>I'm white and born in Finland. By your logic, if I move to the UK and become a naturalized citizen, then I would be a native.

Here is where you're wrong. You would not be native, you would still be a foreigner. Finns are not White Brits. Russians, Austrians, etc. may all be White, but they are not White Brits, and are therefore not native Brits, even if they move and gain citizenship.

>So the one third figure is both racist and incrdibly stupid.

Neither racist nor stupid, just wrongthink.

>Native means you're born somewhere.

White Brits are the only indigenous Brits.

>Equating nationality by skin color is ethnonationalism.

Glad that's not what I nor DHH did.

>So I guess congrats, you're a nazi.

So I guess congrats, you're a genocidal Maoist-Leninist-Marxist.

[tovej]

You seem to be shifting definitions by moving from native Brits to "indigenous" Brits. And conveniently not responding to the point that native means you're born somewhere. Native is the word DHH uses.

The indigenous claim is also funny, because that would refer specifically to Celtic peoples in Britain. And the modern white British population is not predominantly Celtic, and definitely not indigenous. The Anglo-Saxons, e.g., are not indigenous to Britain.

Which leads to the most hilarious point of your post, where you first equate nationality with skin color (in a particularly misguided way) "White Brits are the only indigenous Brits", and then immediately deny that you are equating nationality with skin color.

That's a decent self-contradiction speedrun.

I don't get it. You clearly hold ethnonationalist views and aren't afraid to express them, so I wonder why you're afraid of admitting that you are an ethnonationalist. Be honest about it.