|
|
|
|
|
|
by stronglikedan
217 days ago
|
|
|
> If our understanding of these supernovae is wrong, as this paper claims, that would be a massive scientific breakthrough. Indeed. It's so hard to definitively prove things that are, that the most significant breakthroughs prove things that aren't (so to speak), imho. |
|
|
Significant breakthroughs do both. Prove things aren’t as we thought. And are as the new model suggests.