|
|
|
|
|
|
by sigmoid10
224 days ago
|
|
|
Usually we still ask for statistics to be at least valid (i.e. have a significant signal under a null hypothesis). This paper doesn't even do that. It's like claiming no humans have been to the moon and then "verifying" this by randomly asking a million random strangers on the street if they've been there. |
|
|