[pjc50]

As a Brit who has been exposed to the blanket coverage of this on social media: Mamdani is going to be like Sadiq Khan. Popular with people in the city, while those outside run endless weird fantasy "news" scare stories because he's a Muslim.

[CommanderData]

GBnews has been unrelenting and it's frankly worked to turn non-Londoners against London and Khan.

It's disgusting they're allowed to vilify him so much without any accountability.

[jpfromlondon]

as a proud Londoner I'd like to see him held accountable for his own lies and questionable behaviour.

[pjc50]

.. such as? Compared to previous mayor Boris Johnson?

[tim333]

Yeah likewise interested as a Londoner.

The thing that annoys me the most is that by scapegoating Khan they avoid fixing the problems that are the responsibility of others. Like knife crime - the tories cut 1/3 of the police force, crime went up in London but also in the rest of the country but the papers are all lets slag Kahn for it which is jolly fun I guess but doesn't stop the stabbings and phone snatchings in a way that the central government which controls the laws and budgets could do.

[tim333]

I'm a Londoner who voted for Khan. There's a difference in that contrary to all the scapegoat stuff in the right wing press, Khan has had largely sensible middle of of the road policies. And where he has deviated from the average, on air pollution, it's been stuff I'm in favour of - I have desire to get sick/die from that.

Mamdani seems like a nice guy but some of his policies seem a bit bonkers - state owned retail outlets and the like.

[rkuykendall-com]

Isn't it proposing running like five grocery stores to test? That's not bonkers or radical. Or even expensive. It seems like the type of experiment HN would love.

[lotsofpulp]

It’s an unnecessary experiment that wastes time. Kroger/Costco/Walmart/Albertsons all have 2% profit margins. These are extremely optimized, large scale businesses. No city government is going to do it for cheaper.

Which means the most prices can be lowered is 2%.

Which means the problem in food deserts is the customers are too poor.

Which means the solution is giving poor people money.

But that is not a winning political position, so we have all these nonsense proposals.

[acdha]

> Which means the most prices can be lowered is 2%.

For people who live near one of those stores and can afford to shop competitively. In many urban environments, the competition is smaller shops or places which know you aren’t going to spend an hour driving elsewhere.

I live in DC, and we have a Safeway near us which often charged 2-3 TIMES what Costco charged. Once a second market opened in our neighborhood, just like magic the prices at Safeway came down.

The corner market was basically never competitive on prices because it’s tiny and carries the small sized products which always work out to a higher cost.

[rsynnott]

> In many urban environments, the competition is smaller shops or places which know you aren’t going to spend an hour driving elsewhere.

I'm kind of curious what is different about the US environment that makes this the case. Most large European cities have supermarkets (national chains) all over the place. To the point that it gets a bit silly; I've got about five Tescos in easy walking distance, which have the same prices as other Tescos (one is a Tesco Metro, which is slightly more expensive).

[acdha]

In the U.S., the answer usually comes back to racism. In the post-WWII era, a lot of mostly-white people moved to the suburbs. This pulled a lot of tax base and business away and also lead to a lot of neighborhoods being partitioned by highways so the suburban office workers could commute faster. In some areas, that combined with politics problems lead to riots in the 60s which further damaged many neighborhoods. All of that lead businesses not to invest or to pull out of less profitable neighborhoods. People who could afford cars would accelerate the shift by driving to the higher-end markets, so this can produce a negative feedback loop over decades, especially when businesses aren’t jumping to put money into remodeling or upgrading those locations.

Every time I’ve been in Europe I keep asking why we can’t have those markets, too. Trying to minimize time spent out of our cars and avoid contact with our neighbors has had a really big price.

[rsynnott]

It doesn't look like there _are_ any Walmarts in NYC? Are supermarkets in NYC actually offering the same prices as supermarkets in places where there are Walmarts?

[nobody9999]

>It doesn't look like there _are_ any Walmarts in NYC? Are supermarkets in NYC actually offering the same prices as supermarkets in places where there are Walmarts?

That's true. There are a couple of Costcos, but since I don't own a car (like most New Yorkers) it's not all that useful.

And supermarkets in NYC (in car-centric places some NYC supermarkets are smaller than gas station convenience stores) are definitely more expensive than supermarkets outside NYC.

What's more, the "food deserts" that Mamdani's proposal is trying to address don't have any supermarkets and folks are forced to take the bus or the subway to shop for groceries. I'd also note that most subway stations do not have elevators, making it much more difficult to shop for any length of time, especially for older, less mobile folks.

[ceejayoz]

> Kroger/Costco/Walmart/Albertsons all have 2% profit margins.

And yet, plenty to spend billions on share buybacks.

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/kroger-albert...

[lotsofpulp]

What else should Kroger do with their $2.6B net income from $147B of revenue? Buybacks are just a more tax efficient form of distributing profits compared to dividends, which is the reason people invest in stable businesses that are not going to experience growth.

Otherwise, it would be a charity.

[ceejayoz]

I mean, this line hints at at least one alternative they've in fact done a little in the past.

> Kroger said it would repurchase $7.5 billion of its shares after a more than two-year pause, with $5 billion of that to be repurchased in an accelerated fashion — the same sum that Kroger estimated Wednesday it has spent to lowering prices over the past 21 years.

[TulliusCicero]

> It’s an unnecessary experiment that wastes time. Kroger/Costco/Walmart/Albertsons all have 2% profit margins.

And yet Aldi's prices in the states are more than 2% below Albertson's. Almost like there actually is more room for improvement?

[lotsofpulp]

Aldi is a limited service grocer that doesn't have to deal with employee unions and costly departments like meat/deli/bakery/etc.

That is the underlying story, is that fewer Americans can afford the full service grocer (or maybe don't want to patronize due to smaller household sizes and less cooking). Also, Aldi has successfully fended off unions, which are mostly a thing legacy grocers like Albertsons and Kroger have to deal with.

[Izkata]

Part of Mamdani's plan is to increase taxes on white neighborhoods, which could be used to offset cost and make it seem cheaper.

[nobody9999]

That's a straight up lie.

Please show me where any plan like that is published. And specifically which neighborhoods that every white person will pay more taxes. The actuarials say I should live another 25 years or so. I'll wait.

Or are you referring to the proposed 2% increase in income taxes for folks making over USD$1,000,000/annum, which has exactly zero to do with location (other than NYC as a whole)?

Such an increase, while suggested by Mamdani, is not within the purview of the mayor of NYC to implement. Rather, any tax increase must be passed by the state legislature and signed into law by the governor. The most NYC's mayor can do is ask the state.

Are you that uninformed? Do you even live in NY State?

[Izkata]

First bullet point on page 4: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iGn9ws9Ds0x_3kkB1tdM2pxLlbk...

From https://nypost.com/2025/06/27/us-news/socialist-nyc-mayoral-...

If it was just about wealth, why bring race into it?

[tim333]

Ah maybe.

[crowbahr]

When a church runs a football nobody blinks an eye, when a city runs 5 grocery stores as a pilot in food deserts...

[rozap]

It's a pilot of 5 publicly funded grocery stores in food deserts. I don't know if food deserts exist in London, but they're pretty bad in the US. Like, you cannot buy a vegetable for miles. It's a sensible policy to eliminate food deserts just from a public health perspective.

[rsynnott]

It doesn't seem like _that_ bonkers an idea? It'd be a trial, and, well, if they can't compete, they can't compete. And if they _can_ compete, then they will drive down prices.

People probably thought the UK's state-owned bank was a bit bonkers at the time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girobank) but it _worked_; it forced private banks to expand access and to modernise. And then eventually it couldn't compete. But it's hard to consider it as anything other than a success.

(This is all assuming that NYC supermarkets have a competition problem in the first place, though. Never been to NYC, so wouldn't know.)