Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 230 days ago
Tesla's strategy is bad. Build something that works first then optimize.

They optimized for cost first and may never get it to work.

3 comments

Exactly, and the Waymo sensors are practically a superset of those of Tesla, so with all the acquired data, then can build models that slowly phase out the need for Lidars.
It seems to me Tesla's mistake was over optimism about AI. Musk always seemed to believe they'd have it cracked the following year but it seems to be taking its time.
If I recall correctly, at the last Tesla AI Day, he said ~"FSD basically requires AGI."

There is a lot to unwrap there, but that's what he said. I believe at that moment he was in ML talent recruitment mode, and yet he admitted the true scale of this issue that Tesla faces given the vision-only direction.

That's an interesting take. So, classic premature optimization for scale?
Yes.

A normal approach is:

1) Make it work

2) Make it right(/safe)

3) Make it fast/cheap

The surprising thing to me is when you look at Starlink, there was a very expensive blocker there: consumer phased array. Prior to Starlink, I think the cheapest consumer unit was around $50k. That did not stop Musk from charging ahead.

Is there some technological thing about LiDAR that would prevent similar cost reductions? Or, is it just the philosophical difference over pre-mapping, and not doing so?

LIDAR has seen many cost reductions as capabilities continue to increase. I don't know the area well enough to speculate how much optimization might be left.

> Or, is it just the philosophical difference over pre-mapping, and not doing so?

It seems to be a "burn the ships" style bet that the Tesla engineers will get to camera-only self driving first without having ever relied on LIDAR. It's equally as likely (or moreso) that Waymo could get there first with better ground truth data from the LIDAR.

>A LiDAR unit, for instance, used to cost 30,000 yuan (about $4,100), but now it costs only around 1,000 yuan (about $138) — a dramatic decrease, said Li. https://cleantechnica.com/2025/03/20/lidars-wicked-cost-drop...

at $138 I'm not sure there's much need to go cheaper.

I think it's that with Tesla he had hardware to sell (and maybe already sold?) to existing customers with the contractual promise that they'd get self-driving as soon as TESLA cracked it. Retrofitting LIDAR into all those already sold cars would have been pretty expensive at the time, and the more he doubles down the more monstrously expensive it'll get.

With Starlink, there was no baseline consumer product to sell before getting it working.

Yeah, that makes perfectly rational sense to me. But, still disappointing as Musk is one of the few CEOs in a position to admit miscalculations, and pivot. The only thing I am left with is uncharitable, and it involves online ego.