[hedora]

I think the term you are looking for is “blood libel”, which I haven’t heard until recently.

From context, it means “to speak the truth and present irrefutable evidence to back it up”.

I guess that’s a crime?

[water-data-dude]

No, it's a very specific thing and not at all applicable here. Blood libel was something along the lines of "the Jewish people are murdering children to use their blood for secret ceremonies"[0]. The "libel" part should give it away - it doesn't apply to someone revealing true facts.

The people calling it blood libel because the facts are inconvenient and make Israel look bad are being disingenuous.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel

[throwawayk7h]

This is the first time I've ever seen someone suggest there was truth to the blood libel. It seems pretty obviously absurd to me that there would exist a Jewish ritual requiring Christian blood. Can you provide this "irrefutable evidence," please?

[wredcoll]

It's a reference to the video of israeli crimes being referred to as "blood libel"