|
|
|
|
|
|
by mamcx
234 days ago
|
|
|
If you are more like "parallel" than "async" totally yes! here "parallel" is used in the most broad sense where you have (probably unrelated) tasks that are mostly independent for each other and run to completion. In that case "async" is an anti-pattern. So if you work more process-based that switch-based go! |
|
|